Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is November 22, 2014
home news sports feature opinionfyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » November 30, 2004 » Opinion » Letter to the Editor: CCHP Addresses Land Use Issues Better
Published 3,644 days ago

Letter to the Editor: CCHP Addresses Land Use Issues Better


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

By RAY BLOXHAM
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

On November 18 the Sun Advocate published an article about the current Price resource management plan revision. While we appreciate the piece, we felt that we had a responsibility to respond to it with some other concepts concerning the Bureau of Land Managements draft resource management plan (DRMP).

There is no doubt that the Price BLM Field Office manages many impressive areas, including Nine Mile and Desolation Canyons, the Book Cliffs, and a large portion of the San Rafael Swell. Given that the Price Field Office's new DRMP will guide all BLM decisions on these lands for the next 15-20 years. It is imperative that the document is forward-thinking, and addresses not only today's concerns, but that it also tries to anticipate future conflicts as well.

We agree with the motorized community's statement that the DRMP was inadequate. This document is very long and confusing, which makes it nearly impossible to figure out what the BLM is proposing.

The draft resource management plan fails to include adequate maps of the travel plan, and omits all of the routes that the BLM has already designated in the San Rafael Swell area. After we reviewed the document, we realized that BLM failed to offer the public an adequate range of alternatives to meet everyone's needs.

For this reason, the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, along with many other groups around the state, chose to endorse the Castle Country Heritage Proposal (CCHP). The CCHP is a comprehensive management proposal that balances many uses for BLM lands in the Price district. The proposal leaves open over 2500 miles of motorized routes that access popular destinations.

Under the proposal, riparian areas, wildlife habitat, and roadless areas, will remain nonmotorized, an approach even off-road vehicle (ORV) interest groups can support. The CCHP travel plan includes a broad spectrum of recreational opportunities for various types of motorized vehicles and nonmotorized recreation users, like hunters, horseback riders, mountain bikers, hikers, wildlife viewers, family campers, and sightseers.

If the BLM adopts the CCHP, approximately 65 percent of BLM lands would be within 1 mile of a motorized route. Furthermore, the CCHP supports energy development, especially in places with the highest potential for energy production, while protecting a few low-potential areas from such development.

The CCHP is a forward looking plan; it provides motorized access opportunities and energy development while seeking management for other areas that will provide for continued wildlife habitat, cultural resource protection, scenic vistas, healthy ecosystems, and quiet places that offer opportunities to escape the hustle-bustle of everyday life.

The CCHP strives to protect the quality of life, as well as the outstanding lands, of this area for future generations to enjoy.

Ray Bloxham is the Resource Management Planning Coordinator for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Opinion  
November 30, 2004
Recent Opinion
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us