Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is October 22, 2014
home news sports feature opinionfyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » October 26, 2004 » Opinion » Why I Support Initiative One
Published 3,648 days ago

Why I Support Initiative One


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

By JAKE GARN
Former U.S. Senator

As most people know, I have always loved to fly. Being a pilot gives me an interesting perspective. With a bird's eye view of our beautiful state � from our expanding cities along the Wasatch Front to canyon country and our northern forests. My love for Utah runs deep. But these days, from the air, I can also see how fast Utah is changing and I can see the congestion and pollution that threaten our quality of life. How will we make room for 1 million more people by 2020? The question isn't if we're going to grow, it's how. Now is the time to plan wisely for growth and protect what makes Utah special. This is why I support Initiative One.

Initiative One will raise $150 million in conservation bonds to protect our sources of drinking water, wildlife, farm and ranch lands, parks and trails, open space and cultural and historic landmarks all for only $14 per year for the average Utah family. It is a conservative measure based on the principal of stewardship: we owe it to future generations to prudently conserve the natural resources that add so much to our quality of life today. And it's not just our quality of life that's at stake; it's our economy. From our red rock canyons to our ski slopes, from the Great Salt Lake to our rivers and streams, Utah's natural heritage is our competitive advantage that attracts tourism and new business to our state.

How can we afford to pass Initiative One? The real question is, how can we afford not to? For instance, my former senate colleagues in the east tell of spending billions of dollars for water treatment plants in order to obtain potable water but, by protecting our canyons, farmlands and watersheds today, we can do the same here in Utah for far less. It also makes sense, during these times of low interest rates, to obtain conservation financing at 3 to 4 percent at a time when land prices are escalating at 8 to 10 percent. In the long run, this timely investment in Utah's future will save taxpayers millions.

Initiative One is not about wilderness or our pubic lands it's about maintaining the quality of life where we live. It honors private property rights, prohibits condemnation, ensures all transactions will be completed on a willing seller basis and guarantees lands will remain on the tax rolls. Initiative One funds will be awarded to projects by the Quality Growth Commission, which has an outstanding record managing conservation funds, on a competitive basis � and all finances will be subject to annual audits and legislative review.

I also like Initiative One's emphasis on local control by involving local governments and civic leaders in the decision making process. While most funding will be available for land and water protection, enhancement programs to improve wildlife habitat, soils, and groundwater management will also be eligible. And in rural communities with different quality growth priorities, projects to build trails, recreational facilities and protect historic landmarks can be funded too. Initiative One is about more than just open space.

Initiative One has strong bi-partisan support from both gubernatorial candidates, numerous conservation groups and business and civic leaders statewide. It is a balanced proposal that puts people first by allowing landowners and local communities to protect what's special to them, without government control, on an entirely voluntary basis.

Finally, when I think of what other states are doing in this area, I have to ask the question, are we as Utahns any less proud of our natural environment? In recent years conservation bonds have passed in Nevada ($200 million), Colorado ($170 million) and Arizona ($173 million) while Utah's only state source for this purpose, the LeRay McAllister Fund, has been cut 74 percent by the Legislature to less than $800,000 today. Our neighboring states recognize how important these investments are to make. It's time we did too.

There's an old saying, I didn't plan to fail, I just failed to plan. As a pilot, I can literally see this happening from the air. We can invest now by passing Initiative One, or we can fail to plan and become just another western state. For me this is an easy choice. With great foresight, our forefathers carefully laid out our cities and set aside places so we can enjoy the Utah we do today.

Now it's our turn to plan � and our turn to give something back.


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Opinion  
October 26, 2004
Recent Opinion
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us