Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is November 22, 2014
home news sports feature opinionfyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » June 29, 2004 » Opinion » What is right for the Spring Glen cemetery?
Published 3,798 days ago

What is right for the Spring Glen cemetery?


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

By HAROLD AND FRANCES CUNNINGHAM
Spring Glen


Editor:

With the passing of Memorial Day, we have reverence for our dead, holding dear their memories. The LDS Spring Glen Cemetery holds many of our relatives.

The cemetery ground was deeded to the LDS Spring Glen Ward in the 1890's by Mary Jane Babcock, who as a young bride came to Spring Glen in 1881 with her family. The cemetery holds the remains of many Spring Glen people, regardless of creed. Before Helper had an official cemetery, Helper residents along with miners, who worked for the Independent Coal & Coke Company, were also buried there.

About 1960, my first historical project began with the counting of all cemetery markers, visiting family members and obtaining family histories. At that time were many sunken and unmarked graves. Over the years, cleaning the cemetery has removed the evidence of them.

Since then, families have unofficially erected or enlarged fenced off areas, cemented boundaries, some of them over and encroaching on unmarked graves, staked off areas and claimed them as "theirs". Sometimes it was reported that as people were digging a grave site they came onto an old casket and pushed it aside.

It was early policies that families paid for lots, but no record now exists and it is very unlikely that any of us can prove a deed receipt for a grave site. It was also a policy that no one could be buried in the cemetery unless they were given permission under rules that only if their family was already buried there and if there was room.

Twice the LDS Spring Glen Ward asked the county to take over the cemetery, but this request was refused.

Now what is the legal and moral in the cemetery is in question.Why do some feel that they have can just go "mark off" and bury someone in this cemetery without permission?

Last reported the cemetery has been closed to further burials.


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Opinion  
June 29, 2004
Recent Opinion
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us