Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is July 29, 2014
home news sports feature opinionfyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » January 13, 2004 » Opinion » Letter to the Editor: Need to evaluate power company
Published 3,850 days ago

Letter to the Editor: Need to evaluate power company


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

By PAUL L. YOUNG
St. George

Editor:

With the recent deluge of the most welcome snow, the weather created power outages to over 70,000 Utah Power & Light Company customers. Going into the fourth day, as I write this, there is still over 2,500 customers without power.

In several instances there is room for error and finger pointing at several parties involved. When PacifiCorp took over Utah Power and Light Company one of its first changes it instigated was reduction of personnel. If you ask a person that was released from the company the reduction was 20 percent of the payroll. If you inquire of an employee still working for the utility the percentage of employee reduction was 17 percent. The majority of those dismissed from the company were in the lines and service department.

Before the reduction, in one district there were five line crews. One crew was assigned to maintain the transmission lines, the other four crews was assigned to distribution services, doing such things as connecting new customers, installing outdoor yard lights, replacing rotted poles and those hit by cars, etc. One of those crews was a tree trimming crew that cut the limbs on trees that threatened the distribution lines. Today, there are only three crews assigned in that district. The tree trimming crew was dismissed. In another case, one area had three crews and maintained an area over 75 miles long. Now there is only one crew assigned to that line.

The following year PacifiCorp applied to the Public Service Commission for a rate increase. If PacifiCorp was running short of funding why didn't they apply the reduction savings back into the system? And before the Public Service Commission gave PacifiCorp their rate increase why didn't they make inquiries of the Consumer Protection Agency to see if there were any complaints about PacifiCorp's service to its customer?

Now is the time to review the company's track record and make the necessary adjustments. To prevent another repeat of what has been going on I suggest that our legislators pass a law whereas any company servicing the public, when filing for a rate increase, be required to mail out to all their customers a customer service questionnaire allowing their customers to rate them. And there should be lined space at the bottom of the questionnaire where specific incidents can specified. These should be mailed to the Consumer Protection Agency, then that agency should have a dialogue with the Utah Public Service Commission before the rate increase is granted.


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Web Poll  
April 24, 2014
Do you think armed militia and individuals should have joined the protest last weekend concerning the removal of the cattle owned by Cliven Bundy from BLM land in Southern Nevada?
Yes
No
Don't know
Don't care

View Results

Opinion  
January 13, 2004
Recent Opinion
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us