Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is September 2, 2014
home newssports feature opinion fyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » March 7, 2002 » Local News » Ranchers Challenging BLM Grazing Decision
Published 4,562 days ago

Ranchers Challenging BLM Grazing Decision


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


On March 4, the Canyon Country Ranchers Association announced the Kanab-based group's intent to challenge the United States Bureau of Land Manage-ment's decision to retire four large grazing allotments on the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument.

"Apparently, the BLM has adopted a policy that would eliminate grazing from the monument. Those opposed to grazing operate under a misguided philosophy that our public lands should be managed strictly for preservation purposes," pointed out Worth Brown, association chairman. "Documents we have obtained under the Freedom of Information Act indicate that the BLM has also adopted this philosophy, at least as far as the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument is concerned."

The cattlemen contend that the environmental assessments allowing the retirement of the grazing allotments were "sham documents written solely to facilitate a sweetheart deal with the Grand Canyon Trust ... the BLM tossed valid range science out the window in an attempt to eliminate grazing permits at the behest of the preservation group."

"The environmental assessments are a total misrepresentation of the facts and a complete distortion of monument policy," maintained Brown.

The association alleges the assessments were based on the trust's negotiations to buy out ranchers rather than on valid agency action or range conditions. The trust purportedly approached stockmen and offered cash payments to purchase of a voluntary relinquishment security interest in connection with the allotments. The contracts obligate the cattlemen to turn in grazing permits to the BLM before the federal agency can eliminate grazing from an allotment. Under normal procedures, grazing on an allotment would continue under a different permittee, explained Brown.

The cattlemen group claims that the BLM violated the law by deciding to eliminate grazing before completing the planning documents. The issue is not whether a rancher can sell an allotment - allotments are bought and sold frequently. The issue is whether a preservation organization can purchase a grazing permit, then secretly negotiate an agreement with the BLM to permanently retire the permit, concluded the cattlemen group.


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Local News  
March 7, 2002
Recent Local News
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us