Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is October 6, 2015
home news sports feature opinionfyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » December 16, 2003 » Opinion » Letter to the Editor: Facts support wilderness
Published 4,312 days ago

Letter to the Editor: Facts support wilderness

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

Salt Lake


I moved to Utah in 1990 because of its unique natural qualities. I'm no athlete, but I've still been able to explore much of Utah's wild lands and have even discovered a natural bridge. I've also found a lot of misrepresentation, propaganda, and a woeful lack of facts surrounding our land usage debates. I would like to address some of these issues:

Myth: Wilderness is exclusionary. Fact: You cannot drive overland (off a designated road) in a non-wilderness area; you have to leave your motorized transport to enjoy the land not seen from the road, the same restrictions as wilderness.

Fact: 90 percent of proposed wilderness is within three miles of existing roadways.

Fact: There are over 100,000 miles of existing, valid dirt roads to enjoy our desert lands from.

Myth: Wilderness locks up huge amounts of oil, which we need. Fact: A 2003 USGS report identifies a five-day supply of fuel underneath Utah, with less than 2 percent of that in areas with wilderness characteristics.

Fact: We don't need the oil; we covet the oil. Conservation and a responsible energy policy would immediately negate our "need" for further oil exploration and extraction.

Myth: Wilderness would remove traditional users (grazing) from the land. Fact: Grazing is allowed in wilderness.

Fact: Persistent drought, low prices, and being in a desert have a negative impact on ranching.

Myth: Wilderness will hurt rural economies. Fact: Resource employment and revenue have been rapidly declining since the early 1980's and are due to less demand, increased productivity, and industry trends (all done without any wilderness designation).

Fact: Out of state companies take their revenue out of state with them.

Fact: The latest oil lease sales (11/24/03) by the BLM on a total of 36,000 acres netted the state less than $500,000 (Salt Lake Tribune 12/2/03). That's less than $14 per acre that the state receives as compensation for the destruction of some of our most pristine public lands.

Fact: The limited oil represents short-term revenue at best; after the fuel is gone there won't be any economic base, the lands will not be left in a condition that people will travel to visit.

Fact: Utah's natural areas drew 16 million visitors in 2002; travelers spent $4.15 billion and generated $332 million in tax revenue (Utah Travel Council).

Myth: These public lands should be locally controlled. Fact: This would be like allowing only New Yorkers to have a say in what happens to the Statue of Liberty; would we let them decide to put a Yankees cap on her head? No, that would be ridiculous. So what's the difference? Proximity does not equal ownership; national interest should be the compelling management factor.

Myth: Wilderness proponents are extremists. Fact: More than half of Utah's wilderness quality lands have been degraded since the Wilderness Act passed in 1964.

Fact: Citizen groups have documented nine million acres and even the BLM inventoried almost six million acres of wilderness quality lands managed by the BLM in our state.

Fact: There are only 27,700 acres of designated wilderness on BLM lands, with less than three million acres being managed to prevent impairment.

Fact: Poll after poll across Utah and the nation have shown conclusively that Americans want more wilderness protection, not less, and they support Wilderness designation of our public lands.

As a citizen, I am outraged with the callous attitude our "elected" officials have toward our public land. I even question why there must be an economic motive for protecting these jewels. Why do we ignore the value of things like a soul, re-invigorated by a quiet visit with our host, or a child's fascination at finding something unobservable in a human dominated environment?

We have in Utah some of the most incredible lands on the planet; it would be immoral to squander these gifts from our creator.

It's time for congress to do its job and pass America's Redrock Wilderness Act.

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

Top of Page

December 16, 2003
Recent Opinion
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories

Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us