Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is October 6, 2015
home news sports feature opinion fyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » October 17, 2013 » Focus » Should off-year elections be consolidated with general el...
Published 719 days ago

Should off-year elections be consolidated with general elections?

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

There are off year elections and then there are off year elections.

This year in many places the only candidates running for office to be elected in November are those from citys, towns and other municipalities.

It is an off year election. But next year there will be another one that gets a lot more play. It is called the mid-term elections.

At the mid-term elections people vote for Congressmen and often other state and municipal officials.

Both these kinds of elections have a much lower voter turnout than the general election when the countrys presidential seat is up for grabs.

The fact is it seems we just went through that, although it was now a year ago.

Are off year elections beneficial or should some kind of consolidation take place?

Those that favor consolidation say that it would save a great deal of money and the turnout would be much higher.

Those opposed say that candidates in grass roots offices, like those appearing on the ballot this November, would be lost in the glare of all the hype and advertising for federal candiddates.

A report by the Greenlining Institute found recently that off-year municipal elections in many West Coast cities result in higher per-voter costs and could lead to a less-representative electorate.

The report uses information from a questionaire that was given to California's 58 counties. Case studies were done to compare data from the counties.

On average those studeis showed that citys and counties with consolidated elections had higher voter turnout and also lower costs per voter than those that followed the normal routine.

Greenline has encouraged all cities and countys to study their situations to determine what would be best for them. It concluded that consolidation is a good move.

Part of the analysis also showed that minority voters were not as prevelant percentage wise in non-consolidated elections either. In some places this could lead to federal voting rights violations.

Opinions are divided. Do cost savings and more voters at the polls justify having much more crowed ballots in which local elections might lose their importance?

It is a question that needs answering.

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

Top of Page

Article Photos  
Browse / enlarge – (1 total)
Print photo(s) with article
Get photo reprints on CD
NOTE: To print only the article and included photos, use the print photo(s) with article link above.
October 17, 2013
Recent Focus
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories

Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us