Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is October 9, 2015
home newssports feature opinion fyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » March 10, 2011 » Carbon County News » RTSSD says 'No, thanks' to idea of grazing on Scofield pr...
Published 1,674 days ago

RTSSD says 'No, thanks' to idea of grazing on Scofield property

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

Sun Advocate reporter

A picnic area is a place for apple pies, not cow pies.

That's basically the philosophy underlying the Recreation/Transportation Special Service District's decision not to allow cattle grazing on district property south of Scofield.

The district owns acreage straddling about 1.8 miles of Mud Creek. Last summer, it joined forces with the Utah Department of Environmental Quality and Division of Wildlife resources in a project to control erosion and improve the habitat in and around the creek.

Further proposals for the property include picnic tables, a pavilion and a walk bridge across the creek.

So when Leroy Mead of the DWR came before the district board Monday to explore the possibility of allowing a neighboring rancher to graze cows on the grassland, the idea did not go far. Mead explained that the DWR wanted to replicate the habitat improvement and pollution control project downstream from the district's property.

Erosion and runoff from cattle byproducts cause mud and nutrients - principally phosphorus - to enter the stream and eventually the reservoir. This leads to a situation of rapid algal growth and subsequent death, a process called eutrophication that depletes oxygen in the water and can cause fish kills.

The problem is that the stream project would involve fencing off the land around the stream banks, and that this is private property used for cattle grazing. Mead told the board that the property owner would go along with the fencing if it would be possible to make up for the lost grazing land by allowing cattle on the district's property.

Several board members noted that this proposal would conflict with the long-range plans for recreational opportunities of hiking, picnicking and fishing.

County commissioner and board member Mike Milovich suggested that it might be possible for the county to work out an alternative arrangement with the landowner to allow grazing on county-owned land in the area.

Neil Breinholt moved that the board reply to the DWR and landowner that the district is "not interested in this particular deal, but we're open to other suggestions." The motion carried.

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

Top of Page

Carbon County News  
March 10, 2011
Recent Local News
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories

Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us