Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices ePubs Subscribe Archives
Today is April 17, 2014
home newssports feature opinion fyi society obits multimedia

Front Page » November 19, 2002 » Local News » Utah files friend of court briefs in sex offender registr...
Published 4,167 days ago

Utah files friend of court briefs in sex offender registry cases


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff has joined two actions asking the United States Supreme Court to overturn decisions against public sex offender registries in Alaska and Connecticut.

The Alaska Court of Appeals ruled that the registries are illegal because the information inflicts additional punishment on sex offenders.

The Connecticut Court of Appeals ruling requires a hearing to determine whether a sex offender is "particularly likely to be currently dangerous" before he or she is added to a public registry.

Before the rulings, the two states had similar programs to the one currently in place in Utah.

The registry was available to the public on the Internet and provided the convicted sex offender's name, crime, current address, physical description and photograph.

"The pubic has a right to know and parents absolutely need to know whether a convicted sex offender is living in their neighborhood," stressed Shurtleff.

The friend of the court briefs argue that the registration does not violate a convicted sex offender's right to due process or restrict the freedom of the individual.

In addition, the friend of the court briefs maintain that the sex offender registry is a public record and the posted information can be accessed in other public records.

The court papers cite numerous studies concluding that a substantial number of convicted sex offenders will recommit crimes and it is nearly impossible to determine which are still dangerous.

One report determined that a convicted sex offender has an average of two "official victims," but admitted to an "average 184 victims per inmate."

Utah and 35 states, territories and districts joined the friend of the court brief in Connecticut. Utah and 42 other jurisdictions signed on for the Alaska brief.

The U.S. Supreme Court previously agreed to hear the arguments in the Alaska and Connecticut cases.


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Web Poll  
March 15, 2014
Now that the Utah State Legislature is done with their regular session how would you rate their performance this year?
Good
Fair
Poor
Don't know
Don't care

View Results


Local News  
November 19, 2002
Recent Local News
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Sun Advocate, 2000-2013. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Sun Advocate.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us